The South Carolina Fraternal Order of Police is committed to providing voters with factual, issue-focused information about candidates seeking public office. As part of the SCFOP endorsement process, all ballot-certified candidates for the United States House of Representatives were invited to complete a congressional candidate questionnaire addressing legislative priorities that directly affect law enforcement officers, public safety, and the communities they serve.
The questions focus on issues that have long been priorities of the Fraternal Order of Police, including officer safety, collective bargaining, retirement security, housing affordability for first responders, due process protections, and other federal legislation affecting law enforcement professionals.
This guide is intended to provide voters with an opportunity to compare each candidate’s positions on these issues using the candidates’ own words.
Responses are presented by congressional district. Within each district, candidates are listed alphabetically by last name. Questions appear in the same order for every race to allow for side-by-side comparison.
Candidates who did not return a completed questionnaire by the published deadline are identified accordingly.
Disclaimer: Responses are published as submitted by each campaign and have not been edited by the South Carolina Fraternal Order of Police except for formatting consistency.
District 1
Candidates
Jenny Costa Honeycutt (Republican)
Campaign Website: www.JennyCostaHoneycutt.com
Nancy Lacore (Democratic)
Campaign Website: www.nancylacore.com
Candidate Background
Do you have any personal connection to the law enforcement community or to the Fraternal Order of Police?
Jenny Costa Honeycutt (Republican)
While I have not personally served as a law enforcement officer, I have proudly supported local
law enforcement as the Chair of the Charleston County Council Public Safety Committee. In this
role, I have consistently worked to provide our Sheriff’s Office with support, resources, and
equipment to protect and serve our community.
Nancy Lacore (Democratic)
Yes. During my time serving in the Navy, as Commander, Naval District Washington, I was responsible for the safety and security of six Navy installations in the National Capital Region and oversaw the Department of the Navy’s civilian police force on those installations. Many of those civilian law enforcement officers were represented by the DC Fraternal Order of Police. In my role, I worked directly with FOP representatives on labor management issues, including workforce policies, staffing, officer safety, equipment, training, and working conditions. I viewed the relationship as a partnership focused on ensuring our officers had what they needed to protect our installations while also ensuring the workforce was treated fairly and professionally.
My daughter is also a police officer in rural Virginia. She knew early on she wanted to go into law enforcement and got her start in corrections. She protects her community every day, then she works twenty-five hours of overtime every week just to pay her bills. She cannot afford to own a home in the community she protects. I know the sacrifices our law enforcement community makes beyond the incredible responsibility of keeping us safe.
Why are you seeking the endorsement of the FOP?
Jenny Costa Honeycutt (Republican)
A community is only as strong as it is safe, and I believe the primary function of government is to protect citizens. I have always and will always stand with our law enforcement officers. This is in stark contrast with my opposition’s party who repeatedly calls for defunding or eliminating important agencies and working relationships. While I proudly have the endorsements of all six sheriffs in the congressional district, having the FOP’s endorsement would be most humbling to me and show that our entire law enforcement community is behind me.
Nancy Lacore (Democratic)
I’m seeking this endorsement because I have dedicated my entire career to public service and protecting our country and communities. Throughout my 35 years in the Navy, I worked alongside military and civilian law enforcement professionals and know firsthand the sacrifice their jobs require.
Ensuring public safety for our communities relies heavily on making sure our law enforcement has the resources they need to do their jobs effectively. I would be honored to earn the FOP’s support because I will be committed to the same values of service, accountability, and safety in Congress and will deliver the resources necessary to help keep our communities safe.
In your public life, have you openly supported the men and women who serve our communities in law enforcement?
Jenny Costa Honeycutt (Republican)
Yes, at every chance I can. This includes working tirelessly to ensure the opening of the Tri-County Biological Science Center – the first regional collaboration from inception on DNA testing in our state’s history – to streamline forensic analysis and strengthen support for law enfocement. This also includes public safety – and the support of law enforcement – as a top pillar of my campaign from day one.
Nancy Lacore (Democratic)
Yes, as previously stated I served in the Navy for 35 years and not only supported law enforcement communities, but also oversaw military and civilian law enforcement operations. I’m the proud mother of a police officer and have always been proud to publicly support our law enforcement communities.
Throughout my campaign so far, supporting those who serve our nation and communities has been a crucial part of my platform. This is one of my top three priorities and is proudly listed on my website, and has been throughout the primary. In Congress, I will always have the backs of our law enforcement, service members, and veterans.
Have you ever been convicted of a crime? If so, please explain the circumstances surrounding the incident.
Jenny Costa Honeycutt (Republican)
No.
Nancy Lacore (Democratic)
No.
Legislative Priorities
Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act
Question
The Fraternal Order of Police strongly supports H.R. 1505/S. 636, the “Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act,” legislation which recognizes collective bargaining rights for public safety employees (law enforcement officers and firefighters).
If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this bill? If not, will you pledge to support this legislation in the 120th Congress?
Jenny Costa Honeycutt (Republican)
No.
Nancy Lacore (Democratic)
Yes, I will support the Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act. I support the right of law enforcement officers, firefighters, and all workers to bargain collectively and ensure they have fair wages, safe working conditions, and the resources needed to protect our communities. I know firsthand through my work with public safety professionals that supporting the people who serve only strengthens our communities.
Homes for Every Local Protector, Educator, and Responder (HELPER) Act
Question
Some studies have shown that rising housing costs and limited housing availability, especially in jurisdictions with residency requirements, may pose obstacles for young people considering a career in law enforcement. The FOP has been working to address this issue by supporting H.R. 2094/S. 978, the “Homes for Every Local Protector, Educator, and Responder (HELPER) Act,” which is modeled on a home loan program administered by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Good Neighbor Next Door (GNND) administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The HELPER Act will establish a new, but very similar, home loan program within the Federal Housing Authority (FHA) for law enforcement officers, firefighters, emergency medical technicians (EMTs), paramedics, and pre-K-12 teachers that would eliminate the down payment and the monthly mortgage insurance premium (MIP) requirements.
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this legislation? If elected, will you pledge to support this legislation in the 120th Congress?
Jenny Costa Honeycutt (Republican)
Yes, I would support this legislation.
Nancy Lacore (Democratic)
Yes, I will support the HELPER Act in Congress. The crucial issue of housing affordability and access for our public servants has been a core component of my platform in this campaign because it is one of the most pressing challenges facing the Lowcountry and beyond. The people who protect our communities, including law enforcement officers, firefighters, EMTs, and teachers, should be able to afford to live in the communities they serve. Reducing the upfront cost of homeownership is a practical way to improve recruitment and retention while strengthening our communities. This is personal for me as my daughter who is a police officer cannot save enough money for a downpayment on a home in the community she protects despite working 25 hours a week of overtime.
Protect and Serve Act
Question
Ambush attacks and violence targeting law enforcement officers have been increasing in recent years. In response to the increased number of ambush attacks, the FOP has made the enactment of H.R. 1551/S. 167, the “Protect and Serve Act” a top priority. The legislation would impose, in limited circumstances, Federal penalties on individuals who deliberately target local, State, or Federal law enforcement officers with violence.
Question: If you were a Member of the House of Representatives in the 115th Congress, how did you vote on H.R. 5698 on May 16, 2018 (Roll Call Vote #188)? If you are a Member of the 119th Congress, are you a cosponsor of H.R. 1551/S. 167? If you become a Member of the 120th Congress, will you pledge to support such legislation and work with the FOP to get it enacted?
Jenny Costa Honeycutt (Republican)
Yes, I would support such legislation and work with the FOP to get it enacted.
Nancy Lacore (Democratic)
Yes. No one should be a target of violence simply because they are enforcing the law. I understand the risks our law enforcement personnel take every day, and it’s something extremely personal to me and my family when thinking about my daughter protecting her community as a police officer. I support strengthening protections for law enforcement officers who are deliberately targeted in the line of duty, and I look forward to working with the FOP to ensure our officers have the legal protections, resources, and support they need to keep our communities safe.
LEOSA Reform Act
Question
The FOP was the primary advocate for the enactment of the Law Enforcement Officers’ Safety Act (LEOSA) in 2004, as well as amendments enacted in 2010 and 2013. The law exempts qualified active and retired law enforcement officers who are properly trained and credentialed from State or local laws prohibiting the carriage of concealed firearms. The FOP strongly supports H.R. 2243/S. 679, the “LEOSA Reform Act.”
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this bill? If you are a Member of the House Committee on the Judiciary, did you vote to favorably report on this bill? If you are currently a Member of the House, how did you vote on passage of H.R. 2243 (Roll Call Vote #128)? If this legislation is not enacted and you are elected to the 120th Congress, will you pledge to support and cosponsor this legislation?
Jenny Costa Honeycutt (Republican)
Yes, I would support this legislation.
Nancy Lacore (Democratic)
I understand the importance of making sure active and retired law enforcement officers have the legal protections they need to keep themselves and their communities safe. I can think of no better candidates for concealed carry. I will support LEOSA for properly trained and credentialed officers because it will further enhance their safety as well as that of the communities they protect. I believe any expansion of LEOSA should preserve appropriate safeguards, maintain firearms qualification standards, and respect legitimate security needs in truly sensitive locations.
Ongoing Consultation with Law Enforcement Leadership
Question
Effective public safety policy requires ongoing consultation with law enforcement professionals. SCFOP values constructive engagement between elected officials and the officers who serve communities across South Carolina.
Question: If elected, how would you ensure regular consultation with the South Carolina Fraternal Order of Police regarding issues affecting officer protections, due process rights, and public safety?
Jenny Costa Honeycutt (Republican)
As I have shared in previous answers, I believe strongly that a community is only as strong as it is safe.
This means it is imperative that our law enforcement officers have the tools, resources, training, and equipment to effectively do their jobs and return home safely to their families. Just as I have done as a Member of the Charleston County Council and as the Chair of the Public Safety Committee, in Congress, I will continue to work tirelessly toward that goal.
I am most humbled and honored to have the support and endorsements of all six sheriffs in South Carolina’s First Congressional District. All know my commitment to not only their departments but also their deputies, local police departments and their officers.
In Congress, I will strive to have not only the best constituent services in the nation but also to have the most accessible office. This means, whenever FOP, our sheriffs, our LEOs want to talk – we will. I have and will continue to have an open door policy and welcome ongoing dialogue whether there is a specifc action that needs attention or not.
Nancy Lacore (Democratic)
When I was responsible for the safety and security of six Navy installations in the National Capital Region, my operations director met regularly with the DC FOP to ensure issues were addressed as soon as they arose and, in some cases, to get ahead of potential issues. Additionally, as Chief of Navy Reserve, leading 60,000 sailors around the world, I spent my time traveling the globe to meet my sailors at their duty stations, listen to their concerns, and bring those perspectives back to Washington. Once back in the Pentagon, I advocated for the resources and policy changes they needed. That is the same approach I will bring as a member of Congress: meeting with community stakeholders like the South Carolina FOP regularly, listening to the officers serving our communities, and bringing their priorities back to Washington to deliver results and the resources needed to keep South Carolinians safe.
District 2
Candidates
Joe Wilson (Republican)
Campaign Website: joewilsonforcongress.com
Zyon Khalifa (Democratic)
Campaign Website: www.khalifaforcongress.com
Do you have any personal connection to the law enforcement community or to the Fraternal Order of Police?
Joe Wilson (Republican)
Yes. Without question, helping provide and stand with South Carolina’s law enforcement
community has been one of the key highlights of my career. Additionally, it’s personal to
me. My son, Alan Wilson, has had the great honor of serving as South Carolina’s Attorney
General for over a decade. It’s important to me, just as it’s important to him, to stand up for
our law enforcement community not just when it’s popular, but when it matters most.
Zyon Khalifa (Democratic)
Yes. As a kid, I took part in a Christmas with a Cop program, where local officers took children out to Walmart to shop for Christmas together. It’s a memory that has stayed with me, officers giving up their own time to make sure kids in our community had a good Christmas, and it shaped how I think about what law enforcement means to a community beyond the badge and the uniform.
Why are you seeking the endorsement of the FOP?
Joe Wilson (Republican)
Having the endorsement from the FOP means the law enforcement community knows that I have their back. That matters to me. And if I am honored with this endorsement, I will not let you down.
Zyon Khalifa (Democratic)
I’m seeking the FOP’s endorsement because the officers you represent are the ones who answer the call when a family in Aiken, Barnwell, Orangeburg, or Lexington Counties, or anywhere else in SC-02 dials 911, and they deserve a member of Congress who treats their safety, their due process rights, and their earned benefits as a priority rather than an afterthought. I served in the Air Force Reserve, so I understand what it means to put on a uniform and accept real risk in service of your community, and that shapes how seriously I take the obligations we owe the people who serve and protect us in South Carolina. A major focus of my campaign is support for local communities through local relationships, and law enforcement and first responders are the lifeblood and sentinels in our neighborhoods and a key relationship to maintain and foster.
In your public life, have you openly supported the men and women who serve our communities in law enforcement?
Joe Wilson (Republican)
Absolutely. Throughout my time in Congress, I have consistently stood with law enforcement
and supported policies that strengthen public safety and back those who serve. I have
opposed efforts to defund the police, supported funding for training and equipment, and
advocated for measures that protect law enforcement officers as they carry out their duties. I
have regularly met with officers, sheriffs, chiefs of police, and their organizations throughout
South Carolina to hear their concerns and ensure their voices are represented in Washington.
I firmly believe that strong support for law enforcement is fundamental to safe neighborhoods,
secure communities, and a strong America.
Zyon Khalifa (Democratic)
Yes. As a candidate for Congress, I’ve made public safety funding and support for officers part of my platform, and as a lawyer and Air Force Reserve veteran I’ve built my public life around the idea that those who serve deserve real support, not just words at election time. That commitment goes back further than this campaign, as a kid, I took part in a Christmas with a Cop program, where local officers gave up their own time to take children shopping for Christmas at Walmart. I’ve carried that example of service with me ever since.
Have you ever been convicted of a crime? If so, please explain the circumstances surrounding the incident.
Joe Wilson (Republican)
No.
Zyon Khalifa (Democratic)
No. I have never been convicted of a crime and have no criminal record.
Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act
The Fraternal Order of Police strongly supports H.R. 1505/S. 636, the “Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act,” legislation which recognizes collective bargaining rights for public safety employees (law enforcement officers and firefighters).
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this bill? If not, will you pledge to support this legislation in the 120th Congress?
Joe Wilson (Republican)
I am currently not a co-sponsor of this bill. However, knowing that this legislation is important
to the FOP is important to me. I will review this legislation with my staff and take a sincere
approach to understanding its purpose.
Zyon Khalifa (Democratic)
If elected, I will support and work to advance the Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act in the 120th Congress. Officers and firefighters who put their lives on the line for their communities deserve a real seat at the table when it comes to their pay, safety equipment, and working conditions. My campaign has already built relationships with unions and workers’ rights organizations across South Carolina, and I bring that same approach here: finding solutions that respect the rights, needs, and position of every stakeholder as we move our communities forward together.
Homes for Every Local Protector, Educator, and Responder (HELPER) Act
Some studies have shown that rising housing costs and limited housing availability, especially in jurisdictions with residency requirements, may pose obstacles for young people considering a career in law enforcement. The FOP has been working to address this issue by supporting H.R. 2094/S. 978, the “Homes for Every Local Protector, Educator, and Responder (HELPER) Act,” which is modeled on a home loan program administered by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Good Neighbor Next Door (GNND) administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The HELPER Act will establish a new, but very similar, home loan program within the Federal Housing Authority (FHA) for law enforcement officers, firefighters, emergency medical technicians (EMT), paramedics, and pre-K-12 teachers that would eliminate the down payment and the monthly mortgage insurance premium (MIP) requirements.
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this legislation? If elected, will you pledge to support this legislation in the 120th Congress?
Joe Wilson (Republican)
I am currently not a co-sponsor of this bill. However, knowing that this legislation is important to
the FOP is important to me. I will review this legislation with my staff and take a sincere
approach to understanding its purpose.
Zyon Khalifa (Democratic)
If elected, I will support and work to advance the HELPER Act in the 120th Congress. This fits squarely with what I’m already fighting for on housing access in SC-02, if you can afford the monthly payment, cost shouldn’t be the reason you can’t get the loan, and that should be especially true for the officers, firefighters, EMTs, and teachers who serve our communities every day. My campaign has a focus on recruitment and retention of the elements to revitalize all of the communities throughout our district; law enforcement and first responders are a critical component of that effort.
Protect and Serve Act
Ambush attacks and violence targeting law enforcement officers have been increasing in recent years. In response to the increased number of ambush attacks, the FOP has made the enactment of H.R. 1551/S. 167, the “Protect and Serve Act” a top priority. The legislation would impose, in limited circumstances, Federal penalties on individuals who deliberately target local, State, or Federal law enforcement officers with violence.
Question: If you were a Member of the House of Representatives in the 115th Congress, how did you vote on H.R. 5698 on 16 May 2018? (Roll Call Vote# 188)
If you are a Member of the 119th Congress, are you a cosponsor of H.R.1551/S. 167?
If you become a Member of the 120th Congress, will you pledge to support such legislation and work with the FOP to get it enacted?
Joe Wilson (Republican)
Yes.
Zyon Khalifa (Democratic)
If elected, I will support and work with the FOP to advance legislation that holds accountable those who deliberately target law enforcement officers with violence, while ensuring any such legislation is drafted carefully and includes appropriate due process protections. I believe that a critical component of the legislative process is the inclusion of those with lived experience, and therefore on this bill and other bills substantially in the same area I would invite first-person, lived experience from your membership as a key element of constituent engagement to make sure that our law enforcement and other first responders receive the care and protection they deserve for the crucial role they play in our communities.
LEOSA Reform Act
The FOP was the primary advocate for the enactment of the Law Enforcement Officers’ Safety Act (LEOSA) in 2004, as well as amendments to the statute enacted in 2010 and 2013. The law exempts qualified active and retired law enforcement officers who are properly trained and credentialed from State or local laws prohibiting the carriage of concealed firearms. The FOP is working to expand this exemption to include magazine capacity, the Guns Free School Zones Act, and access to certain Federal buildings, like post offices. The FOP strongly supports H.R. 2243/S. 679, the “LEOSA Reform Act,” which would fix current loopholes to better protect off-duty and retired law enforcement officers. The House bill was passed in May 2025 on a 229-193 vote.
Joe Wilson (Republican)
I voted for the passage of this bill and I will vote for it again in the future.
Zyon Khalifa (Democratic)
Off-duty officers shouldn’t have to worry about being caught in a loophole regarding their constitutional right to bear arms and their official professional requirement to carry them. Our campaign supports reasonable, officer-supported positions on gun carry regulation, but does not believe an officer should have to worry that they may have left their service weapon or their off-duty weapon in their personal vehicle or another personal item and run the risk of legal complications. They are entrusted with carrying these tools in their professional capacity, and that judgment and trust do not disappear when they are off the clock. We believe legislation can be crafted that respects the rights of private entities, including local businesses, schools, and places of worship, to control access to weapons on their private property, or the U.S. government to set reasonable restrictions on weapon prohibition, while still allowing law enforcement and other qualified first responders an exemption from legal repercussions for such carry practices. Many of these same provisions should apply to retired law enforcement officers who are otherwise in good standing with their legal rights to carry weapons.
Ongoing Consultation with Law Enforcement Leadership
Effective public safety policy requires ongoing consultation with law enforcement professionals. SCFOP values constructive engagement between elected officials and the officers who serve communities across South Carolina.
If elected, how would you ensure regular consultation with the South Carolina Fraternal Order of Police regarding issues affecting officer protections, due process rights, and public safety?
Joe Wilson (Republican)
I regularly host members of the law enforcement community both in district and in our nation’s
capitol. I hope to foster a constant line of communication between the FOP and the greater law
enforcement community.
Zyon Khalifa (Democratic)
If elected, I’ll build regular, direct engagement with the South Carolina Fraternal Order of Police into how my office operates, not as a one-time meeting, but as an ongoing relationship. That means regular check-ins with FOP leadership and local lodges across the district, briefings before I take positions on legislation affecting officer protections, due process rights, or public safety funding, and the same open-door approach I’m committing to across SC-02 more broadly: regular town halls and direct accessibility, including for communities that often get overlooked.
District 3
Candidates
Eunice Lehmacher (Democratic)
Campaign Website: www.euniceforsc.com
Sheri Biggs (Republican)
Campaign Website: www.sheribiggs.com
Do you have any personal connection to the law enforcement community or to the Fraternal Order of Police?
Eunice Lehmacher (Democratic)
I served on The City of Clemson’s Police Advisory Board for three years ending in Feb. 2024
Sheri Biggs (Republican)
No response received by the deadline.
Why are you seeking the endorsement of the FOP?
Eunice Lehmacher (Democratic)
I support police and would welcome an endorsement which I would publicize on my website and social media.
Sheri Biggs (Republican)
No response received by the deadline.
In your public life, have you openly supported the men and women who serve our communities in law enforcement?
Eunice Lehmacher (Democratic)
Yes, I support the police. For example, I have talked to the dementia support group I co-lead about using reverse 911 to inform officers about a person with dementia in the home and have worked with the Oconee Sherrif’s Department to help caregivers get trackers they provide for persons with dementia who wander.
Sheri Biggs (Republican)
No response received by the deadline.
Have you ever been convicted of a crime? If so, please explain the circumstances surrounding the incident.
Eunice Lehmacher (Democratic)
No
Sheri Biggs (Republican)
No response received by the deadline.
Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act
The Fraternal Order of Police strongly supports H.R. 1505/S. 636, the “Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act,” legislation which recognizes collective bargaining rights for public safety employees (law enforcement officers and firefighters).
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this bill? If not, will you pledge to support this legislation in the 120th Congress?
Eunice Lehmacher (Democratic)
Yes, I would support this bill. I value collective bargaining rights.
Sheri Biggs (Republican)
No response received by the deadline.
Homes for Every Local Protector, Educator, and Responder (HELPER) Act
Some studies have shown that rising housing costs and limited housing availability, especially in jurisdictions with residency requirements, may pose obstacles for young people considering a career in law enforcement. The FOP has been working to address this issue by supporting H.R. 2094/S. 978, the “Homes for Every Local Protector, Educator, and Responder (HELPER) Act,” which is modeled on a home loan program administered by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Good Neighbor Next Door (GNND) administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The HELPER Act will establish a new, but very similar, home loan program within the Federal Housing Authority (FHA) for law enforcement officers, firefighters, emergency medical technicians (EMTs), paramedics, and pre-K-12 teachers that would eliminate the down payment and the monthly mortgage insurance premium (MIP) requirements.
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this legislation? If elected, will you pledge to support this legislation in the 120th Congress?
Eunice Lehmacher (Democratic)
Yes, I would support this bill if I’m elected to the 120th congress.
Sheri Biggs (Republican)
No response received by the deadline.
Protect and Serve Act
Ambush attacks and violence targeting law enforcement officers have been increasing in recent years. In response to the increased number of ambush attacks, the FOP has made the enactment of H.R. 1551/S. 167, the “Protect and Serve Act” a top priority. The legislation would impose, in limited circumstances, Federal penalties on individuals who deliberately target local, State, or Federal law enforcement officers with violence.
Question: If you were a Member of the House of Representatives in the 115th Congress, how did you vote on H.R. 5698 on May 16, 2018 (Roll Call Vote #188)? If you are a Member of the 119th Congress, are you a cosponsor of H.R. 1551/S. 167? If you become a Member of the 120th Congress, will you pledge to support such legislation and work with the FOP to get it enacted?
Eunice Lehmacher (Democratic)
Yes, I support this bill.
Sheri Biggs (Republican)
No response received by the deadline.
LEOSA Reform Act
The FOP was the primary advocate for the enactment of the Law Enforcement Officers’ Safety Act (LEOSA) in 2004, as well as amendments to the statute enacted in 2010 and 2013. The law exempts qualified active and retired law enforcement officers who are properly trained and credentialed from State or local laws prohibiting the carriage of concealed firearms. The FOP is working to expand this exemption to include magazine capacity, the Guns Free School Zones Act, and access to certain Federal buildings, like post offices. The FOP strongly supports H.R. 2243/S. 679, the “LEOSA Reform Act,” which would fix current loopholes to better protect off-duty and retired law enforcement officers. The House bill was passed in May 2025 on a 229-193 vote.
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this bill? If you are a Member of the House Committee on the Judiciary, did you vote to favorably report on this bill at the Committee’s mark-up? If you are currently a Member of the House, how did you vote on passage of H.R. 2243 (Roll Call Vote #128)? If this legislation is not enacted and you are elected to the 120th Congress, will you pledge to support and cosponsor this legislation?
Eunice Lehmacher (Democratic)
If elected to the 120th Congress, I would study this bill and talk to police officers regarding aspects of the bill. Currently I do not support off duty officers carrying weapons into Guns Free School zones, but I would study the legislation and make a decision when it is brought up.
Sheri Biggs (Republican)
No response received by the deadline.
Ongoing Consultation with Law Enforcement Leadership
Effective public safety policy requires ongoing consultation with law enforcement professionals. SCFOP values constructive engagement between elected officials and the officers who serve communities across South Carolina.
Question: If elected, how would you ensure regular consultation with the South Carolina Fraternal Order of Police regarding issues affecting officer protections, due process rights, and public safety?
Eunice Lehmacher (Democratic)
A Congresswoman cannot be an expert on everything. I intent to consult with police officers and the FOP on bills that relate to the police before I vote on legislation.
Sheri Biggs (Republican)
No response received by the deadline.
District 4
Candidates
Courtney McClain (Democratic)
Campaign Website: www.mcclainforsc.com
William Timmons (Republican)
Campaign Website: votetimmons.com
Do you have any personal connection to the law enforcement community or to the Fraternal Order of Police?
Courtney McClain (Democratic)
Yes. During my time matriculating at the University of South Carolina, I had the opportunity to collaborate with law enforcement at the State House on advocacy efforts supporting legislation focused on strengthening community safety. In addition, I have partnered with local organizations dedicated to promoting public safety and fostering constructive relationships between law enforcement and at-risk communities.
William Timmons (Republican)
Yes, during my time as a prosecutor, I worked every day with members of law enforcement to help keep our communities safe. Many of the men and women who serve across Greenville County remain friends from my time as a prosecutor and throughout my service in Congress. Today, my team and I rely on law enforcement agencies across South Carolina’s Fourth Congressional District (SC-04) to keep us informed about local issues and help us do our jobs more effectively in Congress.
Why are you seeking the endorsement of the FOP?
Courtney McClain (Democratic)
I am seeking the endorsement of the Fraternal Order of Police because I believe that public safety and community trust are not competing values, but that they are the same goal, and achieving one requires investing in the other.
I have spent my life watching communities in South Carolina’s Fourth Congressional District navigate real and persistent challenges around safety, resources, and trust in institutions.
I believe that solving these challenges starts with electing leaders who are willing to sit at the table with both sides and do the hard work of cultivating real relationships.
I am seeking your endorsement because I want to show up for the officers who are underfunded, understaffed, and increasingly asked to respond to mental health crises, housing instability, and addiction that go beyond traditional law enforcement work without the needed training or resources.
Congress can better these environments, and I intend to use that platform to fight for the resources, tools, and support that law enforcement professionals deserve. Simultaneously, I know that community trust in law enforcement is something that has to be built, not assumed. My commitment to the communities of District 4 has always centered on listening to residents, to faith leaders, to business owners, and yes, to the officers walking those neighborhoods every day.
William Timmons (Republican)
I am seeking the endorsement of the FOP because supporting law enforcement has been a priority throughout my career. As a prosecutor, I worked to hold criminals accountable and help keep our communities safe. In Congress, I have continued that commitment by consistently voting to provide officers with the resources they need, opposing efforts to undermine law enforcement, and fighting to ensure they have a strong advocate in DC.
In your public life, have you openly supported the men and women who serve our communities in law enforcement?
Courtney McClain (Democratic)
Yes.
William Timmons (Republican)
Yes, I am a very strong advocate for our communities officers and will continue to be during my time in Congress and when I return to private life.
Have you ever been convicted of a crime? If so, please explain the circumstances surrounding the incident.
Courtney McClain (Democratic)
No.
William Timmons (Republican)
No.
Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act
The Fraternal Order of Police strongly supports H.R. 1505/S. 636, the “Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act,” legislation which recognizes collective bargaining rights for public safety employees (law enforcement officers and firefighters).
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this bill? If not, will you pledge to support this legislation in the 120th Congress?
Courtney McClain (Democratic)
Yes, I pledge to support this legislation.
William Timmons (Republican)
I am not currently a cosponsor of this bill. After briefly checking, I believe it is something I can consider supporting. I will have my team take a deeper look in the following weeks and I am happy to report back when we decide for both this Congress and the next.
Homes for Every Local Protector, Educator, and Responder (HELPER) Act
Some studies have shown that rising housing costs and limited housing availability, especially in jurisdictions with residency requirements, may pose obstacles for young people considering a career in law enforcement. The FOP has been working to address this issue by supporting H.R. 2094/S. 978, the “Homes for Every Local Protector, Educator, and Responder (HELPER) Act,” which is modeled on a home loan program administered by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Good Neighbor Next Door (GNND) administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The HELPER Act will establish a new, but very similar, home loan program within the Federal Housing Authority (FHA) for law enforcement officers, firefighters, emergency medical technicians (EMTs), paramedics, and pre-K-12 teachers that would eliminate the down payment and the monthly mortgage insurance premium (MIP) requirements.
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this legislation? If elected, will you pledge to support this legislation in the 120th Congress?
Courtney McClain (Democratic)
Yes, I pledge to support this legislation.
William Timmons (Republican)
I am not currently a cosponsor. This bill goes through a Committee that I sit on (Financial Services), so I will gladly discuss with my team and with the Chairman about a best path forward for both this Congress and the 120th.
Protect and Serve Act
Ambush attacks and violence targeting law enforcement officers have been increasing in recent years. In response to the increased number of ambush attacks, the FOP has made the enactment of H.R. 1551/S. 167, the “Protect and Serve Act” a top priority. The legislation would impose, in limited circumstances, Federal penalties on individuals who deliberately target local, State, or Federal law enforcement officers with violence.
Question: If you were a Member of the House of Representatives in the 115th Congress, how did you vote on H.R. 5698 on May 16, 2018 (Roll Call Vote #188)? If you are a Member of the 119th Congress, are you a cosponsor of H.R. 1551/S. 167? If you become a Member of the 120th Congress, will you pledge to support such legislation and work with the FOP to get it enacted?
Courtney McClain (Democratic)
Yes, I pledge to support this legislation.
William Timmons (Republican)
I was not in the 115th Congress. I am currently not a cosponsor, but am happy to take a further look with my team and work to get this bill enacted either in this Congress or the 120th.
LEOSA Reform Act
The FOP was the primary advocate for the enactment of the Law Enforcement Officers’ Safety Act (LEOSA) in 2004, as well as amendments to the statute enacted in 2010 and 2013. The law exempts qualified active and retired law enforcement officers who are properly trained and credentialed from State or local laws prohibiting the carriage of concealed firearms. The FOP is working to expand this exemption to include magazine capacity, the Guns Free School Zones Act, and access to certain Federal buildings, like post offices. The FOP strongly supports H.R. 2243/S. 679, the “LEOSA Reform Act,” which would fix current loopholes to better protect off-duty and retired law enforcement officers. The House bill was passed in May 2025 on a 229-193 vote.
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this bill? If you are a Member of the House Committee on the Judiciary, did you vote to favorably report on this bill at the Committee’s mark-up? If you are currently a Member of the House, how did you vote on passage of H.R. 2243 (Roll Call Vote #128)? If this legislation is not enacted and you are elected to the 120th Congress, will you pledge to support and cosponsor this legislation?
Courtney McClain (Democratic)
More research is needed, before pledging to support this legislation.
William Timmons (Republican)
I voted in the affirmative on H.R. 2243. Of note, every Republican voted yes, and only 15 Democrats voted yes. If this does not become law, I will continue to support LEOSA Reform even though I am not a member of the Judiciary Committee.
Ongoing Consultation with Law Enforcement Leadership
Effective public safety policy requires ongoing consultation with law enforcement professionals. SCFOP values constructive engagement between elected officials and the officers who serve communities across South Carolina.
Question: If elected, how would you ensure regular consultation with the South Carolina Fraternal Order of Police regarding issues affecting officer protections, due process rights, and public safety?
Courtney McClain (Democratic)
If elected, within my first ninety days in office, I will establish standing quarterly meetings with FOP leadership to talk through officer protections, due process concerns, and public safety priorities. I will also designate a dedicated law enforcement liaison in my congressional office so your members always have a direct line that gets answered. When legislation comes before Congress that addresses officer due process rights, collective bargaining protections, or public safety funding, I will reach out to the SC FOP for consultation before casting a vote to fully understand the impact of the legislation.
William Timmons (Republican)
As I have throughout my four terms in Congress, my team and I will continue to regularly meet with, check in with, and support the South Carolina FOP. It is my responsibility to stay informed and ensure I am advocating for the best interests of the Fourth District. Supporting the men and women of law enforcement is an important part of that mission because safe communities are the foundation for families and businesses to thrive. I look forward to continuing to work with the FOP as we advance policies in Washington that help make South Carolina the best place in the country to live, work, and raise a family.
District 5
Candidates
Mallory Dittmer (Democratic)
Campaign Website: www.dittmerforcongress.com
Wes Climer (Republican)
Campaign Website: votetimmons.com
Do you have any personal connection to the law enforcement community or to the Fraternal Order of Police?
Mallory Dittmer (Democratic)
No response received by the deadline.
Wes Climer (Republican)
My brother, John, is a law enforcement officer in North Carolina.
Why are you seeking the endorsement of the FOP?
Mallory Dittmer (Democratic)
No response received by the deadline.
Wes Climer (Republican)
I am a longtime and consistent supporter of law enforcement officers and agencies and would be honored to earn the Fraternal Order of Police’s support.
In your public life, have you openly supported the men and women who serve our communities in law enforcement?
Mallory Dittmer (Democratic)
No response received by the deadline.
Wes Climer (Republican)
Yes, in the South Carolina Senate, I have worked closely with law enforcement officials from across the state on a number of law enforcement priorities, including law enforcement compensation and benefits, fixing deficiencies in criminal laws that impaired their ability to effectively do their jobs, providing better equipment and resources to agencies, enhancing inter-agency cooperation, and combatting policies that would undermine law enforcement officers’ ability to carry out their duties safely and effectively. In the most recent legislative session, for example, my sole earmark request was for the York County Sheriff’s Office; I defied Senate leadership during the budget debate to enhance law enforcement officers’ retirement benefits; and I helped pass the HALO Act to protect law enforcement officers in the conduct of their duties.
Have you ever been convicted of a crime? If so, please explain the circumstances surrounding the incident.
Mallory Dittmer (Democratic)
No response received by the deadline.
Wes Climer (Republican)
No.
Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act
The Fraternal Order of Police strongly supports H.R. 1505/S. 636, the “Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act,” legislation which recognizes collective bargaining rights for public safety employees (law enforcement officers and firefighters).
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this bill? If not, will you pledge to support this legislation in the 120th Congress?
Mallory Dittmer (Democratic)
No response received by the deadline.
Wes Climer (Republican)
I am unlikely to support that bill, because I oppose collective bargaining for public employees.
Homes for Every Local Protector, Educator, and Responder (HELPER) Act
Some studies have shown that rising housing costs and limited housing availability, especially in jurisdictions with residency requirements, may pose obstacles for young people considering a career in law enforcement. The FOP has been working to address this issue by supporting H.R. 2094/S. 978, the “Homes for Every Local Protector, Educator, and Responder (HELPER) Act,” which is modeled on a home loan program administered by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Good Neighbor Next Door (GNND) administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The HELPER Act will establish a new, but very similar, home loan program within the Federal Housing Authority (FHA) for law enforcement officers, firefighters, emergency medical technicians (EMTs), paramedics, and pre-K-12 teachers that would eliminate the down payment and the monthly mortgage insurance premium (MIP) requirements.
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this legislation? If elected, will you pledge to support this legislation in the 120th Congress?
Mallory Dittmer (Democratic)
No response received by the deadline.
Wes Climer (Republican)
I would very likely support that legislation. Before firmly committing to it, I would want to more comprehensively study the home financing measures included in the HELPER Act, but I am inclined to support it on the basis of my preliminary review.
More broadly, I live in a fast-growing community with rapidly rising housing costs and it bothers me greatly that many middle class families are being priced out of homeownership in this area. More broadly, the issue of housing affordability must be addressed by closing the supply-demand imbalance which has caused prices to rise so quickly. Although I do not believe the federal government should interfere in local zoning decisions, I do believe the federal government has a role to play in providing infrastructure funding support to communities that demonstrate a commitment to increasing housing supply.
Protect and Serve Act
Ambush attacks and violence targeting law enforcement officers have been increasing in recent years. In response to the increased number of ambush attacks, the FOP has made the enactment of H.R. 1551/S. 167, the “Protect and Serve Act” a top priority. The legislation would impose, in limited circumstances, Federal penalties on individuals who deliberately target local, State, or Federal law enforcement officers with violence.
Question: If you were a Member of the House of Representatives in the 115th Congress, how did you vote on H.R. 5698 on May 16, 2018 (Roll Call Vote #188)? If you are a Member of the 119th Congress, are you a cosponsor of H.R. 1551/S. 167? If you become a Member of the 120th Congress, will you pledge to support such legislation and work with the FOP to get it enacted?
Mallory Dittmer (Democratic)
No response received by the deadline.
Wes Climer (Republican)
Yes – I will join as a cosponsor. I have introduced and supported similar legislation in the South Carolina Senate.
LEOSA Reform Act
The FOP was the primary advocate for the enactment of the Law Enforcement Officers’ Safety Act (LEOSA) in 2004, as well as amendments to the statute enacted in 2010 and 2013. The law exempts qualified active and retired law enforcement officers who are properly trained and credentialed from State or local laws prohibiting the carriage of concealed firearms. The FOP is working to expand this exemption to include magazine capacity, the Guns Free School Zones Act, and access to certain Federal buildings, like post offices. The FOP strongly supports H.R. 2243/S. 679, the “LEOSA Reform Act,” which would fix current loopholes to better protect off-duty and retired law enforcement officers. The House bill was passed in May 2025 on a 229-193 vote.
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this bill? If you are a Member of the House Committee on the Judiciary, did you vote to favorably report on this bill at the Committee’s mark-up? If you are currently a Member of the House, how did you vote on passage of H.R. 2243 (Roll Call Vote #128)? If this legislation is not enacted and you are elected to the 120th Congress, will you pledge to support and cosponsor this legislation?
Mallory Dittmer (Democratic)
No response received by the deadline.
Wes Climer (Republican)
Yes, I would cosponsor that legislation.
Ongoing Consultation with Law Enforcement Leadership
Effective public safety policy requires ongoing consultation with law enforcement professionals. SCFOP values constructive engagement between elected officials and the officers who serve communities across South Carolina.
Question: If elected, how would you ensure regular consultation with the South Carolina Fraternal Order of Police regarding issues affecting officer protections, due process rights, and public safety?
Mallory Dittmer (Democratic)
No response received by the deadline.
Wes Climer (Republican)
As I have for the entirety of my service in the South Carolina Senate, I will maintain frequent communication with law enforcement officers and agencies throughout my district, including proactively seeking out ways to help them do their jobs as safely and effectively as possible. In keeping with that commitment, I will be more than happy to engage in ongoing conversation with the Fraternal Order of Police about the organization’s legislative priorities.
District 6
Candidates
James E. “Jim” Clyburn (Democratic)
Campaign Website: none found
John Peterson (Republican)
Campaign Website: www.johnpeterson.org
Do you have any personal connection to the law enforcement community or to the Fraternal Order of Police?
James E. “Jim” Clyburn (Democratic)
No response received by the deadline.
John Peterson (Republican)
No response received by the deadline.
Why are you seeking the endorsement of the FOP?
James E. “Jim” Clyburn (Democratic)
No response received by the deadline.
John Peterson (Republican)
No response received by the deadline.
In your public life, have you openly supported the men and women who serve our communities in law enforcement?
James E. “Jim” Clyburn (Democratic)
No response received by the deadline.
John Peterson (Republican)
No response received by the deadline.
Have you ever been convicted of a crime? If so, please explain the circumstances surrounding the incident.
James E. “Jim” Clyburn (Democratic)
No response received by the deadline.
John Peterson (Republican)
No response received by the deadline.
Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act
The Fraternal Order of Police strongly supports H.R. 1505/S. 636, the “Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act,” legislation which recognizes collective bargaining rights for public safety employees (law enforcement officers and firefighters).
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this bill? If not, will you pledge to support this legislation in the 120th Congress?
James E. “Jim” Clyburn (Democratic)
No response received by the deadline.
John Peterson (Republican)
No response received by the deadline.
Homes for Every Local Protector, Educator, and Responder (HELPER) Act
Some studies have shown that rising housing costs and limited housing availability, especially in jurisdictions with residency requirements, may pose obstacles for young people considering a career in law enforcement. The FOP has been working to address this issue by supporting H.R. 2094/S. 978, the “Homes for Every Local Protector, Educator, and Responder (HELPER) Act,” which is modeled on a home loan program administered by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Good Neighbor Next Door (GNND) administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The HELPER Act will establish a new, but very similar, home loan program within the Federal Housing Authority (FHA) for law enforcement officers, firefighters, emergency medical technicians (EMTs), paramedics, and pre-K-12 teachers that would eliminate the down payment and the monthly mortgage insurance premium (MIP) requirements.
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this legislation? If elected, will you pledge to support this legislation in the 120th Congress?
James E. “Jim” Clyburn (Democratic)
No response received by the deadline.
John Peterson (Republican)
No response received by the deadline.
Protect and Serve Act
Ambush attacks and violence targeting law enforcement officers have been increasing in recent years. In response to the increased number of ambush attacks, the FOP has made the enactment of H.R. 1551/S. 167, the “Protect and Serve Act” a top priority. The legislation would impose, in limited circumstances, Federal penalties on individuals who deliberately target local, State, or Federal law enforcement officers with violence.
Question: If you were a Member of the House of Representatives in the 115th Congress, how did you vote on H.R. 5698 on May 16, 2018 (Roll Call Vote #188)? If you are a Member of the 119th Congress, are you a cosponsor of H.R. 1551/S. 167? If you become a Member of the 120th Congress, will you pledge to support such legislation and work with the FOP to get it enacted?
James E. “Jim” Clyburn (Democratic)
No response received by the deadline.
John Peterson (Republican)
No response received by the deadline.
LEOSA Reform Act
The FOP was the primary advocate for the enactment of the Law Enforcement Officers’ Safety Act (LEOSA) in 2004, as well as amendments to the statute enacted in 2010 and 2013. The law exempts qualified active and retired law enforcement officers who are properly trained and credentialed from State or local laws prohibiting the carriage of concealed firearms. The FOP is working to expand this exemption to include magazine capacity, the Guns Free School Zones Act, and access to certain Federal buildings, like post offices. The FOP strongly supports H.R. 2243/S. 679, the “LEOSA Reform Act,” which would fix current loopholes to better protect off-duty and retired law enforcement officers. The House bill was passed in May 2025 on a 229-193 vote.
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this bill? If you are a Member of the House Committee on the Judiciary, did you vote to favorably report on this bill at the Committee’s mark-up? If you are currently a Member of the House, how did you vote on passage of H.R. 2243 (Roll Call Vote #128)? If this legislation is not enacted and you are elected to the 120th Congress, will you pledge to support and cosponsor this legislation?
James E. “Jim” Clyburn (Democratic)
No response received by the deadline.
John Peterson (Republican)
No response received by the deadline.
Ongoing Consultation with Law Enforcement Leadership
Effective public safety policy requires ongoing consultation with law enforcement professionals. SCFOP values constructive engagement between elected officials and the officers who serve communities across South Carolina.
Question: If elected, how would you ensure regular consultation with the South Carolina Fraternal Order of Police regarding issues affecting officer protections, due process rights, and public safety?
James E. “Jim” Clyburn (Democratic)
No response received by the deadline.
John Peterson (Republican)
No response received by the deadline.
District 7
Candidates
Russell Fry (Republican)
Campaign Website: russellfrysc.com
John Gregory Vincent (Democratic)
Campaign Website: www.vincentforcongress.com
Do you have any personal connection to the law enforcement community or to the Fraternal Order of Police?
Russell Fry (Republican)
No
John Gregory Vincent (Democratic)
I have done training with many police departments (leadership development, community policing, de-escalation in SC, NC, and GA). I have also done sessions with the FBI National Academy on submarine leadership development (Retired Navy Command Master Chief (submarines). All that is to say, yes, I have met and worked with many departments and made some friends.
Why are you seeking the endorsement of the FOP?
Russell Fry (Republican)
The men and women who serve in law enforcement are heroes who deserve to be celebrated.
Sadly, it has become increasingly mainstream for agitators to demonize law enforcement with
the rally cry of “abolish the police.” In the face of these attacks, verbally and physically, our men
and women who wear the badge still answer the call to keep every American safe — even as
some of those same Americans attack them.
I have proudly stood with our men and women in blue all of my life. As a husband, a father, and
a son, I sleep peacefully at night knowing I can count on law enforcement to keep my family
safe. In a world where police don’t exist, no one has that privilege and Americans need to
remember that.
I am seeking the endorsement of the South Carolina Fraternal Order of Police because we need
fighters in Washington, DC, who are proud to back the blue. We need leaders who are going to
champion our law enforcement, not demonize them. It’s shameful. When trouble comes
knocking, it is law enforcement that communities across the state count on to show up and keep
us safe. Our law enforcement officers deserve to have someone in Washington, DC, that they
can count on to show up for them, not turn their backs on our officers for political convenience.
John Gregory Vincent (Democratic)
From so many of my former shipmates who went into law enforcement to my own engagement and training of law enforcement officers, my bond is deep, my commitment unbreakable. An endorsement would be a deep honor for me personally.
In your public life, have you openly supported the men and women who serve our communities in law enforcement?
Russell Fry (Republican)
Throughout my entire public service career, I have stood alongside our men and women who
wear the badge. Whether that support has been speaking out against the foolish “abolish the
police” movement or leading legislation that advocates for our law enforcement community, I
am proud to defend South Carolina law enforcement officers.
One of the first pieces of legislation I introduced in coming to Congress was the Stop
Importation and Manufacturing of Synthetic Analogues (SIMSA) Act to target deadly drugs that
come into the United States undetected and have similar structures to controlled substances.
By partnering with the law enforcement community, it became very clear that this was an issue
that needed to be addressed. I was proud to work in a bipartisan fashion to not only identify the
legislative problem, but to present a solution. I was grateful to have the Fraternal Order of
Police’s partnership in developing sound policy to address the issue, and for their support for
this bill.
Furthermore, I introduced the Federal Law Enforcement Officer Service Weapon Purchase
Act, which was also supported by the Fraternal Order of Police and advanced out of the U.S.
House of Representatives. Following the tragic murder of Logan Federico, I worked alongside
Logan’s father, Stephen Federico, the late Senator Lindsey Graham, and the law enforcement
community to identify a policy fix that would ensure a murder like Logan’s could never happen
again. I don’t want to just champion our men and women who wear the badge; I want to help
them make our world safer.
I have worked with the law enforcement community throughout my career to identify
commonsense, bipartisan policies that strengthen our communities and make South Carolina
and our country safer. That is the type of support our law enforcement needs on Capitol Hill
and throughout our nation’s political environment, and that is the type of support I am
committed to giving to those who keep our community safe.
John Gregory Vincent (Democratic)
Absolutely, from being a vocal opponent of the “defund the police” movement to speaking out loudly in support of the officers hurt on J6 and just as loudly when those convicted criminals were pardoned, I do not play politics; I call balls and strikes.
Have you ever been convicted of a crime? If so, please explain the circumstances surrounding the incident.
Russell Fry (Republican)
No
John Gregory Vincent (Democratic)
Never.
Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act
The Fraternal Order of Police strongly supports H.R. 1505/S. 636, the “Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act,” legislation which recognizes collective bargaining rights for public safety employees (law enforcement officers and firefighters).
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this bill? If not, will you pledge to support this legislation in the 120th Congress?
Russell Fry (Republican)
I am not currently a cosponsor of H.R. 1505, the Public Safety Employer-Employee
Cooperation Act. Given that South Carolina is a right-to-work state that prohibits collective
bargaining with public sector employees, I do not believe the federal government has the
statutory authority to override the state’s labor laws. Before I sign on to legislation like this at
the federal level, I would hope to see appropriate changes to state law that would make the
laws enforceable in states like ours.
South Carolina stands with our law enforcement and our public safety officials deserve the
best of the best. However, it’s important to me that we get the policy right without negatively
impacting those heroes or their job security in the midst of that pursuit.
John Gregory Vincent (Democratic)
ABSOLUTELY. I have the endorsement of the SC Council of Prisons, and my AFL-CIO endorsement has been forwarded to the national office recommending approval.
Homes for Every Local Protector, Educator, and Responder (HELPER) Act
Some studies have shown that rising housing costs and limited housing availability, especially in jurisdictions with residency requirements, may pose obstacles for young people considering a career in law enforcement. The FOP has been working to address this issue by supporting H.R. 2094/S. 978, the “Homes for Every Local Protector, Educator, and Responder (HELPER) Act,” which is modeled on a home loan program administered by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Good Neighbor Next Door (GNND) administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The HELPER Act will establish a new, but very similar, home loan program within the Federal Housing Authority (FHA) for law enforcement officers, firefighters, emergency medical technicians (EMTs), paramedics, and pre-K-12 teachers that would eliminate the down payment and the monthly mortgage insurance premium (MIP) requirements.
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this legislation? If elected, will you pledge to support this legislation in the 120th Congress?
Russell Fry (Republican)
I am not currently a cosponsor of the Home for Every Local Protector, Educator, and Responder
Act. Affordability concerns are rightly the number one issue in the country right now, and I
believe our majorities in the White House, the House of Representatives, and the Senate were
elected to solve those problems. In the 120th Congress, I would be open to cosponsoring this
legislation if it means making housing more affordable to hardworking public servants who keep
our communities going. However, to make sure that these approaches are practical, I would
want to ensure that the program’s implementation was feasible from the perspective of the
overseeing agencies within HUD and the FHA.
John Gregory Vincent (Democratic)
YES. I have an initiative in my foundational vision to bring back a form of the GI Bill. Affordable home buying and education. I also believe affordable home buying increases employment and therefore revenue. As you know better than I do, when you provide economic opportunity to people, pay increases, crime decreases, and officers like you have a better chance for a decent quality of life.
Protect and Serve Act
Ambush attacks and violence targeting law enforcement officers have been increasing in recent years. In response to the increased number of ambush attacks, the FOP has made the enactment of H.R. 1551/S. 167, the “Protect and Serve Act” a top priority. The legislation would impose, in limited circumstances, Federal penalties on individuals who deliberately target local, State, or Federal law enforcement officers with violence.
Question: If you were a Member of the House of Representatives in the 115th Congress, how did you vote on H.R. 5698 on May 16, 2018 (Roll Call Vote #188)? If you are a Member of the 119th Congress, are you a cosponsor of H.R. 1551/S. 167? If you become a Member of the 120th Congress, will you pledge to support such legislation and work with the FOP to get it enacted?
Russell Fry (Republican)
I was not a member of the 115th Congress. I am a cosponsor of H.R. 1551 the Protect and Serve Act.
If I am reelected to the U.S. House of Representatives, I will cosponsor the Protect and Serve Act once again and fight tooth and nail to get it enacted. The attacks on our nation’s law enforcement are alarming and troubling, and if we continue to turn a blind eye to these assaults, it will only further disincentivize younger Americans from serving in law enforcement. I am deeply committed to fighting to get this legislation over the finish line, and I am grateful to the Fraternal Order of Police for your support.
John Gregory Vincent (Democratic)
Conceptually, I am on board. I would want to make sure that the “limited circumstances” are clearly delineated to ensure the strongest charges are brought forward.
LEOSA Reform Act
The FOP was the primary advocate for the enactment of the Law Enforcement Officers’ Safety Act (LEOSA) in 2004, as well as amendments to the statute enacted in 2010 and 2013. The law exempts qualified active and retired law enforcement officers who are properly trained and credentialed from State or local laws prohibiting the carriage of concealed firearms. The FOP is working to expand this exemption to include magazine capacity, the Guns Free School Zones Act, and access to certain Federal buildings, like post offices. The FOP strongly supports H.R. 2243/S. 679, the “LEOSA Reform Act,” which would fix current loopholes to better protect off-duty and retired law enforcement officers. The House bill was passed in May 2025 on a 229-193 vote.
Question: If you are currently a Member of Congress, are you a cosponsor of this bill? If you are a Member of the House Committee on the Judiciary, did you vote to favorably report on this bill at the Committee’s mark-up? If you are currently a Member of the House, how did you vote on passage of H.R. 2243 (Roll Call Vote #128)? If this legislation is not enacted and you are elected to the 120th Congress, will you pledge to support and cosponsor this legislation?
Russell Fry (Republican)
I am not currently a cosponsor of this bill. Yes, I voted favorably on this bill out of markup. I voted in favor of this bill.
If this legislation is not enacted in the 119th Congress, I will continue to support it next
Congress. Given my previous support of the legislation, I would be open to cosponsoring it in
the 120th Congress.
John Gregory Vincent (Democratic)
Yes. Having more highly trained people in and around our communities can only improve public safety.
Ongoing Consultation with Law Enforcement Leadership
Effective public safety policy requires ongoing consultation with law enforcement professionals. SCFOP values constructive engagement between elected officials and the officers who serve communities across South Carolina.
Question: If elected, how would you ensure regular consultation with the South Carolina Fraternal Order of Police regarding issues affecting officer protections, due process rights, and public safety?
Russell Fry (Republican)
Since coming to Congress, I have maintained an open line of communication with the South
Carolina Fraternal Order of Police. As someone who has never worn the badge, I will never fully
understand the challenges our law enforcement faces. Hearing about the challenges is one
thing. Living those challenges is another.
Given this reality, I view organizations like the South Carolina Fraternal Order of Police as a
partner in helping lawmakers get the policy side of things right. That partnership is strengthened
by maintaining a good, open relationship between the organization, me, and my staff.
Additionally, organizing events alongside the SC FOP like roundtable discussions with relevant
agencies impacting law enforcement officers empowers police officers in South Carolina and
across the country.
As I previously mentioned, I get to do this job without being harmed, sleep in a safe home, and
trust that my loved ones are safe because of the sacrifice our law enforcement officers make to
protect us. I want to return that service by partnering with you and championing the issues that
matter most to you on Capitol Hill.
John Gregory Vincent (Democratic)
Being “Available” is critical to effective leadership. You do not know what is going on in the streets or in the homes while sitting in DC. Key constituent groups, of which the FOP is certainly one, will be on a twice-yearly dedicated meeting schedule.
In addition, upon request from the organization, I will have a dedicated phone line and email, separate from my normal constituent contact channels, for highly urgent matters. Lastly, the President of the South Carolina Fraternal Order of Police will have my personal contact information. As long as these more direct channels are reserved for truly urgent matters and not abused, access will be as described above.
